Whether
in ordinary court proceedings, arbitration proceedings,
mediation or other ADR cases – the demands on
corporate legal experts and lawyers are constantly rising.
The pressures of time and cost, the increasing complexity
of the tasks that are to be accomplished and the growing
signifi cance of expert knowledge require new forms
of work processes. LOGOS helps in the development and
refi ning of the case strategy, as well as during the
proceedings.
Your Advantages:
The Controlling of Complexity secures a Knowledge Lead
The LOGOS case map conveys an equally detailed and synoptic
understanding. All arguments and counter-arguments on
each point can be compared and assessed clearly. The
omissions and gaps in the opponent’s argument,
as well as in your own argument, immediately become
visible, both from a legal and factual perspective.
The Consideration of all the Facts improves
the Argumentative Strength
All documents, information and knowledge are consistently
organized using the LOGOS case map and are immediately
available for concrete issues. Internal and external
written statements are linked to the case map down to
the last paragraph. The relevant norms from the integrated
legal database are automatically linked to the case
map, including the sources quoted in the written statements.
Sound Case Assessment and Risk Analysis increases
Forecasting Security
The transparent illustration of all legal and factual
matters makes it possible to assess concrete issues
in a wide variety of contexts. Logical links between
the elements of the case map allow the user to accurately
subsume the case. The statistics-based assessment principle
in LOGOS makes it possible to forecast probabilities
of occurrence and expected values.
The Effective Use of Working Hours allows you
to Concentrate on the Essentials
The case map ensures that all of those that are involved
in the project can integrate their input in the project
regardless of time or place. New facts and information
can be assigned quickly and easily. As a result, an
immediately available argumentative basis is maintained
even in cases where the volume of data is vast and hardly
comprehensible. Additional staff, neutral instances
and experts can quickly be familiarized with the subject
matter. This considerably reduces the time that is required
to re-familiarize oneself with the subject matter, particularly
in the event of lengthy cases.
|
|
Functional Diversity
|
|
